viernes, 21 de diciembre de 2018

THE FIFTH PART
The unsurpassable model.

By Virgilio Rodríguez Castro.



Dedicated with my respect, affection
and admiration to
Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain.

Virgilio Rodríguez Castro.







THIS IS OUR MODEL.
Who wants to overcome it try it.


I should have expected all this time
to contrast, verify and explain,
inevitably in my own way,
what not everyone understood.
V.R.C.


Dear friends after a deliberate long parenthesis from September 16, 2017 to September 16, 2018, I return to the theme of my task to do to share it with all of you until today December 24, 2018 some reflections resulting from the uncountable shock that my Thesis provoked with its four fifths http://goldenratioaskey.blogspot.com in the international field where, without making allusion to it comprehensively, were trigger with obviousness inspired by exactly the same Thesis, parameters, terms, except the Load Capacity by obvious reasons as we will explain later, and the arguments supported in the publication in question through media, scientific, arts, culture, education, research and even in politics and in the economy various currents directing each of knowledge by the natural way as advised by Nature, that is, from the proposed Mathematical Model: The Earth.



Today here in my country there is a real effervescence for the theme of Science that has been felt from the newspaper stands in the corners of city streets with the first fascicles of NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC Science, Mythology and Mathematics even in Universities, Research Centers and in voice of honorable scientists.


Explainably, the only 2 Sciences that in this serious tenor have not made an appearance or attended these bubbling scenarios are the Economic Sciences and the Political Sciences that understand perfectly well against of them the repercussions of the Model; Model of which, therefore, they have not wanted to speak or address frontally because of the impossibility of being able to make their respective disciplines a place in the scientific field although now it is explained softening from Stockholm 2018 in the voice of the Distinguished Laureates, how the Economy and the Climate will inevitably always walk hand in hand and in a second term, because of the stubborn argument that is made firm as fundamental in the proposed Model, that is, the heavy weight judgment: Load Capacity, that externalizes from the root leaving it in the open once and for all to the prebends and privileges of the irrational mode of capitalist production in detriment of planetary health because, ladies and gentlemen, the seemingly innocuous principles alluded undoubtedly disrupt, as exemplify more go ahead, to the Establishment and they know it and understand it perfectly well; so much so, that they watch with magnifying glass not to unearth the subject because it predicts to destroy the cornerstone of its fatal System.

“No jalen que descobijan” diría mi compadrísimo Nepomuceno who has nothing to do with the Patron of Bohemia.

Certainly, we will change our old ideas of seeing the world and we in it confessing the unspeakable.

In order to have an idea of ​​how our ecosystem has been understood and us in it, I appeal to the very well-tried misrepresented formulations that are raised in addition to others in relation as in this case with the consumption of water.

It is assured, with the unfortunate argument that it is not the liters per capita for our consumption that we require to drink, wash clothes, bathe, brush our teeth, etc., those that undermine aquifers, pretending to protect the increase of the population because of the economic benefits that this represents, but rather it is the billions of cubic meters destined to agriculture and livestock that uninterruptedly drain the aquifers, putting the vital liquid at risk, when we know that they are exactly the same billions of cubic meters that to irrigate crops and to provide livestock indirectly consume humans every day around the world.

Well, to top off the lack of understanding is also argued as valid: what will live who take advantage of development under this focus altering the planetary ecosystem; that is to say, those who, without knowingly knowing that they are doing badly, persist in obtaining their livelihood by cutting down forests, opening up lands for cultivation, changing the use of land by paving them, making products of poor quality, deliberately to mention only a few distortions of the System that has led us here.

So the state of affairs in the XXI century. Word of mouth beliefs continue to represent the great threats of social advancement. Arguments without sustenance: Pure ignorance.

Well, dear friends, we had to say the above because as these erroneous approaches there are, obviously there will be others of normal course that can be swallowed by anyone without knowledge that they should be privileged today.

Having said that, dear friends, without further ado we will enter into matter as we have made clear without any bias of any other order than scientific knowledge.

What we have to clarify the load capacity of the planet, not by whatever method, is the platform for the takeoff that should occupy us without postponing.

Obviously, taxing the population as dictated by the results of scientific studies of the planet aimed at this great purpose with a birth rate controlled by morbidity, mortality, deaths, etc. the first thing that induces us is to reconsider in the control of Methane and CO2 in favor of global warming that solved by itself, although to a large extent it helps, does not tell us anything about the scientific-social-organization that is, the New Social Order that underlies and we have been talking about; and from the perspective of supply and demand, therefore there will be less purchases of the goods that Multinationals and Oxxo stores offer us today, not only in the corners; In other words, if today mathematics is still integrity: less people shop less in tianguis and supermarkets compared to those acquired by an increasingly poor population but growing.

Which explains why it is difficult to assimilate the diligent developers of furniture, real estate, goods and services that are dedicated to buy cheap and sell expensive with the ultimate goal of obtaining money and grow their capital without thinking or care about the effects on the ecosystem planetary.

Because, if the population does not grow, then to whom will we sell our production of cars, houses, airplanes, memberships, yachts, perfumes, construction materials, junk food and for that equivalent order of ideas all that we impose market to satisfy the superfluous needs and not that guarantees us a depauperate population in growth?

A depauperate population growing that evidently has a limit like any other content related to its continent considering the Load Capacity in this case of the Earth that this has to do, with how much we can cover our needs in all orders not only with satisfaction of our food but also that these needs do not destroy or are transformed into abiotic failures.

We cannot grow indiscriminately without paying attention to how many men and women on the Globe we should be knowing the point of dynamic equilibrium that we sustain.



The issue is that we are with thorny inconveniences exceeded and the solution is not as they raised some rascals: exterminate those with a dollar and two a day juggle to live or be 85% of the current population because they in turn would demand to annihilate to 15%.

The Never-ending Story.

So how can you warn, dear friends, the major challenges we face place us at the center of the crossroads that we must clear and not tomorrow; that is to say that we are attending today together at the beginning of what will be the New Social Order understood by some as the New World Order and by other Global Kingdom but all agree that we should build it together as advised by the Proposed Model and the least of it is the label but the transcendental for the case is the way in which we should organize that is how it should be to begin with: by the principle and, the principle advises us: how many in the house we should be

Or be the basis of what we want to develop human activities.

The first is the first and from there we have to leave to organize everything on the planet.



Because, knowing how many we should be, inhabiting the planet, things are amended alone once organized in this true way; that is, under the principles dictated by natural laws that are the only ones that must be submitted not the other way around, thus fulfilling the harmony that must prevail immersed being part of nature. That is, they are neither the policy nor the economy without scientific authority as if accredit the Natural Laws, those that dictate the norms of the human behavior and even more the ones of the nature. 

To what the principle of Rate the Population forces us just for order, not for another interest or caprice?

Well, it forces us to change everything. It forces us to order according to the values ​​in progress and to modify everything that we have taken for granted when it has not been so, because we were marvelously marveled with a flash of progress that finally led us to a mirage undermining the planetary equilibrium concluding that we will begin a new era of social evolution.

When in a human family it is not determined how many members should be even by sex, as it can be today, the repercussions are in the field of food of consideration and more in the field of education, which are the primary ones. Because we know the importance of amino acids for the good learning of knowledge, as well as other important ones such as individuality, the space where ideally live, climates that favor or diminish health, intra-family relationships that by deprivation, possessions and preferences they can lead to severe hostilities; the extramural relationships that temper or dispels the character etcetera; that is, the same thing that happens at a planetary level with the humanities of different latitudes, altitudes, ecosystems, climates and microclimates and, consequently, people of different colors, ethnic groups, cultures, languajes, religions, atavisms and particular ignorances as in the diversity between plants and animals like that among humans for the same reasons.

But, if in a modern family, let's say the s. XXI with access to advances in the scientific knowledge that generates technologies such as extensions of the human body, limbs and brains, it is decided that they are a child, a girl and their parents with university studies, stable and remunerated work at the level of their function, who will have greater possibilities to realize their expectations of family life who does not foresee how many to be and reproduce as rabbits and what that implies in terms of covering the cost of the roof, food and sustenance of those who arrive without rhyme or reason from Paris to this small house where would they inevitably settle in deteriorated places for the reasons mentioned above or who, knowing the risk territories and informed of what happens in this regard, establishes how many members of their family should be?

What would you do?

Sure, you said it!

Assess the population!

Well, the same answers we should expect on a planetary scale of those who are concerned with governing with their puppets or how to produce profiting that is the same but, obviously, it is not so. The degree of difficulty is that they overcome the old brain ties that do not let them think. The old ties that were, are and still are today's possessions and have more. They do not let them walk, they are anchored and the world is running risks because of their clumsy stubbornness with jokes pretending to be geniuses of the mutant forms of capital, when they are no more than simple frauds tartufos who, by their shortcut, take us to the abyss.




Well, here is the classic approach of the glass half full or half empty.

That it will be fine for anyone who wants to see it with its optical uneven but, in what they will always agree and they will see with coincidence is that the glass can only contain a certain amount of liquid; that is to say, that the volume of the content cannot exceed the body of the continent. That is, if the glass in question has a capacity of 365 ml., it does not admit to empty liquid above that quantity simply because it would spill, it would not fit in the bowl, it cannot contain it, there is no correspondence between a thing and the other causing the known drawbacks.

So why in the case of the Earth Continent do not we just decide, keeping it buried by detractors of our Model, which is so obvious to all and it is difficult to put a number and accept how much content the recipient can hold?

Of course it is not because the calculations are difficult to achieve.

No, of course not, the difficulty is simple and has another look.

The difficulty in accepting it is in fact that it would upset everything around.

This is the reason.

And when we change everything we talk is because it would upset everything around the globe being the planet a ball.

Yes, it would disrupt every day way of driving us to this day: new norms that go from eating to working, throwing a grey hair in the air and resting.

You do your own exercise on the basis that we were a certain number of inhabitants based on the Load Capacity that determines El Punto de Equilibrio Dinámico and see how it would be necessary to organize otherwise outside any usual doctrinal current.

But it should not disturb anyone, because today as we never have the knowledge to jointly project for the first time in history a company of this scope that will take us gradually for two centuries generations to assimilate and land.

We cannot do it in any other way without running the risk of screw up.

Look, assuming that the Glob's Load Capacity was one billion inhabitants according to the background of the hypothesis of the Global Scientific Council, the first thing we would have to face is to clarify not what, because we know, but how we should proceed to abate the figures of 7 billion today, to those projected to maintain balance with the Nature of the Planet, right?

And well, in this regard there are many proposals: some unviable and others also.

We cannot accept, as has been suggested, the mass extermination, sterilization, abortion, agendas of I do not know what, etc., but that the population has to be assessed there is no doubt about it; we have no other choice but there are opposing arguments that we know to which interests they obey contrary to development as we must understand it today obligedly. After me the flood they will say.

The production is produced and consumed by human beings, which is why they have to assess, not improvising, juggling games.

We will have to do it in time with new paradigms in the interest of evolving.

As it is foreseen in my book Non nova sed nove, the task to be integral must be deployed in two centuries if we start in these days of the s. XXI and continue with the s. XXII to establish the New Social Order in the s. XXIII, which is what this historical opportunity forces us to do.

Then do not hide in that there was no one to tell them anything.

The New Social Order for an evolving society made of knowledge.

The knowledge of today: http://vicosthenewsocialorder.blogspot.com

Because the richness of the subsoil of Zimbabwe it's the same cat but wallowed.

In reality, boths the international organizations and the moral persons behind the goberments are doing nothing, not even trying, to work in a direction that deserves the height that the world of today demands of us.

We will not allow them to pave the face of the Earth for what contains this fatal synergy and we will license them taking charge of the Direction of the Proyect without aspiring to be leaders of nothing. Who wishes to talk about all this stuff come to Arcadia my place in Aguascalientes Ags., México and if some FB friends like Mark Zuckerberg, Google, GDN, private or public organizations that sympatthize with our long-range proyect, wish to incorporate themselves in the quality that best suit their situation and if they could make a donation to support this cause that is of all, contact me by email. Thanks in advance. 

Take out of you head that everything has to come out of MIT, Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge, similar Univerities, Conciliábulos and other strange Organizations where they prepare the boys to serve the Deep Estate and for that reason, that's why, they get older more and more; there, we will not find more than what they have already produced. 




Everything derives from the original idea. If they have already screwed up, now they stand and take responsibility for what has to be done in all matters without replying because we must backtrack on their unthinkingly savage expansionism for the good of humanity.

Now approved the Load Capacity we will see how in a natural way the forms or models of producing or governing that are analogous will be liberated by themselves; always having in mind with a peripheral vision what is inherent in the worries of present and future man.

That is to start a line of evolution from this fundamental premise.

If someone has another of the same size, let us know.

If we agree that the best way to coexist is to assume the ideal population without overcrowding in a given space, we must project how to reduce surpluses as a primary task in this line of evolution, right?

So, we have to think about time as our best ally in this long process.

And at the same time that we approach the ideal demography, we will build the new structure under these new referents until reaching its culmination of dynamic stability.




And just as we have learned geometry, geography, other subjects and beliefs the most from the remote past, we will delve into today's Modern Educational Centers to know what is useful and what is not, of this baggage in our daily lives to know how to coexist better.



The cyber industry will be our best ally in this purpose, manufacturing robots for industrial tasks, house and office domestics that were once habitual for humans, thus tearing off the chains that the Establishment historically prevailed on man until the day of today.

On the other hand, the Trade Unions that look after the world a similar profile, unlike the tamed paper of the past, will play an antithetical role in the future structuring this long transition stage.

And in the educational field, our opinion is Futoji no henko as the melting pot where the knowledge that gives feedback to the issuer in a permanent energetic flow back and forth is precipitated.




Chemical-electric impulses made ideas, thoughts and knowledge...


Of course the task is not finished but 
I will continue working 
with or without supports 
in a place called Arcadia.




Thanks dear friends and until the next...



No hay comentarios.:

Publicar un comentario